Paw Privileges
Royal Canin

Royal Canin Veterinary Treats Urinary Canine

Submit correction or new panel
Kibble Dog treat

An independent Feed Wise evaluation of Royal Canin Royal Canin Veterinary Treats Urinary Canine, built from the published ingredient panel, guaranteed analysis, certifications and processing method.

Kibble
Manufactured in Canada
Size
Not recorded
Food type
Kibble Dog treat
UPC
Not recorded
Brand
Royal Canin
Country
Canada
Feed Wise Score
3.8out of 10
POOR

Intended use is not published by the manufacturer, so this is not presented as a complete diet

72%
Confidence
Moderate confidence

Share of scoring criteria backed by published evidence.

Product type
Other
Complete & balanced
NOT PUBLISHED
Large breed growth
NOT APPLICABLE
Standard named by source
NOT PUBLISHED

This product is scored against its stated purpose. It is not measured as a complete diet, and it is not penalised for being something it never claimed to be.

Protein

18%

Fat

15%

Estimated carbohydrate

Not calculable

Processing

Extruded

Where to Buy

Expert Summary

Feed Wise rates this below the standard we look for in this category for Royal Canin Veterinary Treats Urinary Canine, a dry kibble formula led by chicken fat, fish oil and fructooligosaccharides. No nutritional adequacy statement is on record, so it is best used as part of a balanced feeding plan or rotation rather than as the sole diet. Owners should note that it declares corn, wheat or soy.

What is actually in this food?

Brewers rice, corn, chicken fat, chicken by-product meal, corn gluten meal, natural flavors, salt, wheat gluten, powdered cellulose, potassium chloride, vegetable oil, monocalcium phosphate, calcium sulfate, fish oil, DL-methionine, fructooligosaccharides, sodium tripolyphosphate, L-lysine, choline chloride, taurine, marigold extract (Tagetes erecta L.), rosemary extract, preserved with mixed tocopherols and citric acid

First 5 ingredients

1. Brewers rice

Tier D, lower value formulation ingredient

Refined Plant Fraction

Refined or fractionated plant ingredient. Lowers ingredient quality when used prominently.

2. corn

Tier D, lower value formulation ingredient

Refined Plant Fraction

Refined or fractionated plant ingredient. Lowers ingredient quality when used prominently.

3. chicken fat

Tier A, exceptional food ingredient

Named Animal Fat

Named animal fat. Species is identified, which supports transparency and fat quality.

4. chicken by-product meal

Tier C, moderate or neutral ingredient

Named Animal Protein

Rendered chicken by-product meal. Named species, but this is organ / by-product content, not muscle meat.

5. corn gluten meal

Tier E, major formulation concern

Concentrated Plant Protein

Concentrated corn protein. Raises crude protein without contributing animal protein.

Animal Protein Quality

3.3 / 25

This is the largest single category in FeedWise. It looks at which animal ingredients are present, whether the species is named, whether organs, egg and named fats are included, and whether concentrated plant proteins are diluting the animal content.

  • Named animal protein first

    The first ingredient is Brewers rice, which is not an animal protein.

    0 / 8
  • Animal Prominence Index

    Animal Prominence Index 37 of 100. This is a FeedWise position-weighted measure of how far animal ingredients dominate the ingredient panel. It is a label-position index, not a manufacturer-disclosed recipe percentage.

    +0.9 / 5
  • Liver

    No liver in the ingredient panel.

    0 / 2
  • Heart

    No heart in the ingredient panel.

    0 / 2
  • Other appropriate organs

    No additional organ meats identified.

    0 / 2
  • Whole egg

    No meaningful egg inclusion.

    0 / 1
  • Named animal or marine fats

    Named animal or marine fat sources: chicken fat, fish oil.

    +2 / 2
  • Verified animal ingredient proportion

    The manufacturer has not published an animal ingredient percentage. Excluded from the score rather than counted against the product.

    NOT SCORED
  • Plant protein disclosure

    Concentrated plant protein is present: corn gluten meal, wheat gluten. The manufacturer does not publish its inclusion level or the animal versus plant share of the crude protein, so the contribution is not quantified. This is deducted once under Ingredient Quality and is not counted again here.

    N/A

Ingredient Quality

6.2 / 20

Every ingredient is classified into a quality tier and weighted by its position on the label, so ingredient number one counts far more than ingredient number fifteen.

  • Position weighted ingredient quality

    9 food ingredients assessed by quality tier with early positions weighted most heavily. 14 fortifying nutrients or preservatives excluded from the average.

    +9.2 / 20
  • Ingredient splitting

    Multiple fractions of the same core ingredient appear: CORN FAMILY (corn, corn gluten meal).

    -1
  • Concentrated plant proteins

    Concentrated plant protein appears at position 5: corn gluten meal, wheat gluten. Scored once here and not repeated in other categories.

    -2

Carbohydrate and Plant Load

0 / 15
  • Estimated carbohydrate: not calculable
  • Pulse ingredients detected: none
  • Plant protein concentrates: corn gluten meal, wheat gluten
  • Ingredient splitting: CORN FAMILY (corn, corn gluten meal)

Carbohydrate is not calculable because ash is not disclosed. It is left blank rather than overstated.

  • Carbohydrate burden

    Carbohydrate is not precisely calculable because ash has not been disclosed. This is an evidence limitation, not evidence of high carbohydrate, so it is removed from the score and reported as reduced confidence.

    NOT SCORED
  • Ingredient based plant load

    Plant load assessed as VERY HIGH. Carbohydrate bearing plant ingredients: Brewers rice (refined grain), corn (whole grain), corn gluten meal (concentrated plant protein), wheat gluten (concentrated plant protein), powdered cellulose (fibre ingredient).

    0 / 8
  • Split plant fractions

    Split plant fractions understate the true plant load in the ingredient order.

    -1

How is it made?

5 / 10

Processing method: Extruded. This category measures food integrity only. Raw handling safety is assessed separately under Safety and Quality Control, so a raw food can score well here and still lose safety points.

  • Processing method

    Extruded processing. Food integrity only. Raw handling safety is assessed separately under Safety and Quality Control.

    +5 / 10

How transparent is the manufacturer?

10 / 10
  • Animal species clearly identified

    Every animal ingredient names its species.

  • Ingredient sourcing disclosed

    Not publicly verified

  • Country or region identified

    Country or region of origin published: Canada.

  • Manufacturing location identified

    Not publicly verified

  • Detailed nutritional analysis

    A detailed nutritional analysis is published.

  • Traceability information

    Not publicly verified

  • Manufacturer provides sourcing detail

    Not publicly verified

  • Overall formulation transparency

    A complete ingredient panel and an identified manufacturer are on file.

Marketing language alone does not count. Anything that has not been published is shown as not publicly verified rather than as a failure.

Nutritional Formulation

10 / 10
  • Complete and balanced for the stated life stage

    Not publicly verified

  • Feeding trial or validation

    Not publicly verified

  • Intended use clearly stated

    Not publicly verified

  • Guaranteed analysis published

    A guaranteed analysis is published for this formula.

  • Calcium and phosphorus disclosed

    Not publicly verified

  • Feeding guidance for supplemental use

    Not publicly verified

Safety and Quality Control

3.3 / 10
  • Batch testing

    Not publicly verified

  • Pathogen testing

    Not publicly verified

  • Supplier verification

    Not publicly verified

  • Lot traceability

    Not publicly verified

  • Nutrient verification

    Not publicly verified

  • Manufacturing quality program

    Not publicly verified

  • Recall context and corrective action

    No recalls on file.

A recall alone does not destroy a score. Severity, cause, frequency, recency and documented corrective action are all considered.

What we could not verify

Unknown information is not treated as bad information. It is scored as unverified and it lowers the confidence rating instead.

  • Carbohydrate (incomplete guaranteed analysis)
  • Verified animal ingredient percentage
  • Ingredient sourcing evidence
  • Manufacturing location
  • Quality control and testing evidence
  • Calcium and phosphorus
Submit a correction or supply missing evidence

Where to Buy

Canadian retailers on record. Stock and price vary by store and province.

    Guaranteed Analysis

    As-fed basis
    Protein
    18%
    20% dry matter
    Minimum crude protein as declared on the label.
    Fat
    15%
    Minimum crude fat as declared.
    Fibre
    3.5%
    Maximum crude fibre as declared.
    Moisture
    10%
    Maximum moisture as declared.
    Energy
    3724
    kcal / kg
    Metabolisable energy per kilogram.

    Certifications & Claims

    Only certifications we can confirm from the brand's own documentation or the certifying body appear here. Nothing is assumed — if a program isn't listed, it isn't disclosed for this product.

    FeedWise Findings

    The FeedWise Verdict

    3.8/ 10PoorModerate Confidence

    Why it scored this way

    • Intended use is not published by the manufacturer, so this is not presented as a complete diet
    • Limited animal protein contribution relative to the plant content
    • Concentrated plant protein contributes to the stated protein
    • High ingredient and sourcing transparency

    Full score breakdown

    Animal Protein Quality3.3 / 25
    Ingredient Quality6.2 / 20
    Carbohydrate and Plant Load0 / 15
    Processing and Food Integrity5 / 10
    Transparency and Sourcing10 / 10
    Nutritional Formulation10 / 10
    Safety and Quality Control3.3 / 10
    Total37.8 / 100

    FeedWise Score 3.8 · Poor · Moderate Confidence

    How FeedWise Scores Dog Food →

    Scored by the FeedWise 100 point model. Read the full methodology.

    Community reviews do not affect the Feed Wise score.

    Owner reviews

    Real experiences from Paw Privileges members. Reviews never affect the Wise score — scoring is based only on label evidence.

    • No reviews yet — be the first.

    Similar Products

    More from Royal Canin