Traditional Blend Pork
Submit correction or new panelKibbleAn independent Feed Wise evaluation of Boreal Traditional Blend Pork, built from the published ingredient panel, guaranteed analysis, certifications and processing method.
- Size
- 13.60 kg
- Food type
- Kibble
- Life stage
- All life stages
- UPC
- Not recorded
- Brand
- Boreal
- Country
- Not disclosed
Intended use is not published by the manufacturer, so this is not presented as a complete diet
Share of scoring criteria backed by published evidence.
- Product type
- Other
- Complete & balanced
- NOT PUBLISHED
- Life stage
- NOT APPLICABLE
- Large breed growth
- NOT APPLICABLE
- Standard named by source
- NOT PUBLISHED
This product is scored against its stated purpose. It is not measured as a complete diet, and it is not penalised for being something it never claimed to be.
Protein
24%
Fat
12%
Estimated carbohydrate
41.5%
Processing
Extruded
Expert Summary
Feed Wise rates this below the standard we look for in this category for Boreal Traditional Blend Pork, an extruded kibble formula built on pork. No nutritional adequacy statement is on record, so it is best used as part of a balanced feeding plan or rotation rather than as the sole diet. Owners should note that the country of manufacture is not disclosed.
What is actually in this food?
pork meal (27%), dehulled barley, steel cut oats, pork fat (7%), brown rice, brewers dried yeast, alfalfa meal, beet pulp, flaxseed, natural flavor (3%), sodium selenite, potassium chloride, choline chloride, calcium propionate, dried apple, dried carrot, ferrous sulfate, zinc oxide, vitamin E supplement, taurine, DL-methionine, copper sulfate, folic acid, vitamin B12 supplement, vitamin A supplement, niacin supplement, selenium, manganese oxide, calcium pantothenate supplement, riboflavin, biotin supplement, vitamin D3 supplement, calcium iodate, zinc amino acid complex, manganese amino acid complex, iron amino acid complex, copper amino acid complex, rosemary extract, citric acid
First 5 ingredients
1. pork meal (27%)
Tier B, high quality supportive ingredient
Named Rendered Protein
Named rendered animal meal. Concentrated named animal protein, but rendered rather than whole.
2. dehulled barley
Tier C, moderate or neutral ingredient
Whole Carbohydrate
Whole carbohydrate source. Evaluated on position, quantity and combined plant load rather than treated as automatically poor.
3. steel cut oats
Tier A, exceptional food ingredient
Named Animal Protein
Named animal ingredient.
4. pork fat (7%)
Tier A, exceptional food ingredient
Named Animal Fat
Named animal fat. Species is identified, which supports transparency and fat quality.
5. brown rice
Tier C, moderate or neutral ingredient
Whole Carbohydrate
Whole carbohydrate source. Evaluated on position, quantity and combined plant load rather than treated as automatically poor.
Animal Protein Quality
12.7 / 25This is the largest single category in FeedWise. It looks at which animal ingredients are present, whether the species is named, whether organs, egg and named fats are included, and whether concentrated plant proteins are diluting the animal content.
- +8 / 8
Named animal protein first
pork meal (27%) is a named animal ingredient in position 1.
- +2.2 / 5
Animal Prominence Index
Animal Prominence Index 53 of 100. This is a FeedWise position-weighted measure of how far animal ingredients dominate the ingredient panel. It is a label-position index, not a manufacturer-disclosed recipe percentage.
- 0 / 2
Liver
No liver in the ingredient panel.
- 0 / 2
Heart
No heart in the ingredient panel.
- 0 / 2
Other appropriate organs
No additional organ meats identified.
- 0 / 1
Whole egg
No meaningful egg inclusion.
- +1 / 2
Named animal or marine fats
Named animal or marine fat sources: pork fat (7%).
- NOT SCORED
Verified animal ingredient proportion
The manufacturer has not published an animal ingredient percentage. Excluded from the score rather than counted against the product.
- 0
Plant protein dilution
No concentrated plant proteins detected.
Ingredient Quality
15.3 / 20Every ingredient is classified into a quality tier and weighted by its position on the label, so ingredient number one counts far more than ingredient number fifteen.
- +15.3 / 20
Position weighted ingredient quality
10 food ingredients assessed by quality tier with early positions weighted most heavily. 29 fortifying nutrients or preservatives excluded from the average.
Carbohydrate and Plant Load
3.8 / 15- Estimated carbohydrate: 41.5 percent
- Pulse ingredients detected: none
- Plant protein concentrates: none
- Ingredient splitting: not detected
Estimated carbohydrate, calculated as 100 minus protein, fat, moisture, fibre and ash.
- +2 / 7
Carbohydrate burden
Calculated with a published ash value carbohydrate of 41.5 percent.
- +1.8 / 8
Ingredient based plant load
Plant load assessed as VERY HIGH. Carbohydrate bearing plant ingredients: dehulled barley (whole grain), steel cut oats (whole grain), brown rice (whole grain), beet pulp (fibre ingredient).
How is it made?
5 / 10Processing method: Extruded. This category measures food integrity only. Raw handling safety is assessed separately under Safety and Quality Control, so a raw food can score well here and still lose safety points.
- +5 / 10
Processing method
Extruded processing. Food integrity only. Raw handling safety is assessed separately under Safety and Quality Control.
How transparent is the manufacturer?
7 / 10Animal species clearly identified
Every animal ingredient names its species.
Ingredient sourcing disclosed
Not publicly verified
Country or region identified
Not publicly verified
Manufacturing location identified
Not publicly verified
Detailed nutritional analysis
A detailed nutritional analysis is published.
Traceability information
Not publicly verified
Manufacturer provides sourcing detail
Not publicly verified
Overall formulation transparency
A complete ingredient panel and an identified manufacturer are on file.
Marketing language alone does not count. Anything that has not been published is shown as not publicly verified rather than as a failure.
Nutritional Formulation
6 / 10Complete and balanced for the stated life stage
Not publicly verified
Feeding trial or validation
Not publicly verified
Intended use clearly stated
Not publicly verified
Guaranteed analysis published
A guaranteed analysis is published for this formula.
Calcium and phosphorus disclosed
Not publicly verified
Feeding guidance for supplemental use
Not publicly verified
Safety and Quality Control
3.3 / 10Batch testing
Not publicly verified
Pathogen testing
Not publicly verified
Supplier verification
Not publicly verified
Lot traceability
Not publicly verified
Nutrient verification
Not publicly verified
Manufacturing quality program
Not publicly verified
Recall context and corrective action
No recalls on file.
A recall alone does not destroy a score. Severity, cause, frequency, recency and documented corrective action are all considered.
What we could not verify
Unknown information is not treated as bad information. It is scored as unverified and it lowers the confidence rating instead.
- Verified animal ingredient percentage
- Ingredient sourcing evidence
- Manufacturing location
- Quality control and testing evidence
Where to Buy
Canadian retailers on record. Stock and price vary by store and province.
Guaranteed Analysis
As-fed basisCertifications & Claims
Only certifications we can confirm from the brand's own documentation or the certifying body appear here. Nothing is assumed — if a program isn't listed, it isn't disclosed for this product.
Not disclosed — no third-party certification is confirmed for this product yet.
FeedWise Findings
The FeedWise Verdict
Why it scored this way
- Intended use is not published by the manufacturer, so this is not presented as a complete diet
- Limited animal protein contribution relative to the plant content
- High carbohydrate load at 41.5 percent
- No concentrated plant protein inflating the protein figure
- High ingredient and sourcing transparency
Full score breakdown
| Animal Protein Quality | 12.7 / 25 |
| Ingredient Quality | 15.3 / 20 |
| Carbohydrate and Plant Load | 3.8 / 15 |
| Processing and Food Integrity | 5 / 10 |
| Transparency and Sourcing | 7 / 10 |
| Nutritional Formulation | 6 / 10 |
| Safety and Quality Control | 3.3 / 10 |
| Total | 53.1 / 100 |
FeedWise Score 5.3 · Fair · High Confidence
How FeedWise Scores Dog Food →Scored by the FeedWise 100 point model. Read the full methodology.
Community reviews do not affect the Feed Wise score.
Owner reviews
Real experiences from Paw Privileges members. Reviews never affect the Wise score — scoring is based only on label evidence.
- No reviews yet — be the first.
Similar Products
